?

Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry

Dear People raised in the UK or Canada, and other people who like filling out polls:

Which of the following would you normally use?

an historian
30(33.0%)
a historian
61(67.0%)

Which of the following would you normally use?

an historical figure
34(37.4%)
a historical figure
57(62.6%)


Languages are challenging, not least because they keep changing. "an historian" and "an historical figure" were some of the British grammatical quirks I got down early.

Only now, the internet tells me, times, they are a changin'. It's okay to use "a" instead of "an" for histor* words in British Englishes. I would like some more evidence on the subject one way or the other.

Comments

makyo
Feb. 10th, 2011 09:57 am (UTC)
Unless you were talking about "a Herb," as the name but not the plant had a pronounced h. Another rule.

This seems to be an American thing - all UK English speakers I know pronounce the h at the beginning of "herb". Well, except in certain informal regional English idioms (eg Yorkshire, Lancashire, Cockney, etc) that drop hs as a matter of course: there's a comic monologue by Stanley Holloway where he recounts the Battle of Hastings, which has a line about King 'arold, "sitting there, with an eye full of arrows, on 'is 'orse, with 'is 'awk in 'is 'and" which illustrates this well.

Eddie Izzard addresses the herb/erb issue (and other matters to do with language) here (contains some strong language right from the outset).