?

Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry

Old buffer redux

A few clarifications, following up on yesterday's poll.

"Lord X was an old buffer."

This is an ambiguous statement.
8(40.0%)
The author clearly means Lord X was a clownish or mocked old man.
7(35.0%)
The author clearly means Lord X was an old petty officer.
0(0.0%)
Other, to be explained in a comment.
5(25.0%)

What is the difference between an old duffer and an old buffer, with respect to human beings? (the_alchemist asked, I'd love to know too.)



Also on the subject of language recently: C wasn't familiar with the phrase "to phone in a performance". major_clanger assures me it's an Americanism.

I'd never encountered "the subject in hand" before, only "the subject at hand"; yet, from online discussions, the former is apparently much more widespread and more multinational than the latter.

Comments

pennski
Dec. 23rd, 2011 07:22 pm (UTC)
For me an "old buffer" is a slightly less condemnatory than "old duffer" who is slightly foolish. Neither have any military connotations for me - just age and upper-middle class at least.