?

Log in

No account? Create an account

Previous Entry | Next Entry

Conference in a nutshell

After three intense days, the conference is over. It's easier to refer to it as "the conference" than by its name, for I'm not really sure how much of the name I need to include to be sure I've covered the whole thing. The handouts proclaim that it was this - "Circulating Knowledge": Fifth Joint Meeting of the BSHS, CSHPS/SCHPS, and the HSS. Even then, however, all the society names are still abbreviated, so there's also a longer version of the title where all the names of the societies are spelled out. I'll just call it "the conference".

In summary, it was good. I learned a great deal, mostly about things well outside what I usually study, and I met a great many interesting people with whom I hope to keep in touch. I ate good meals and went back three times, with a large group, to the Henry House Pub, one of the best pubs I've ever encountered (this coming from someone who doesn't even drink beer). I caught up with many old friends, for, as many good conferences are, this one was a reunion for me of people who graduated in years past from my current department. I met friends of friends, both academic and non. The weather was lovely half of the time and pouring rain the rest. I learned about fraud, preserving corpses with wax in their blood vessels, nineteenth century science education for teenagers, ancient Greek logic, preserved laboratory fish, and manuscript stemma.

My paper went well. The audience asked good questions, some thought-provoking, which was a pleasant change. I'm always hungry for more content feedback than I usually receive. As usual at non-medieval conferences, I was in a token medieval session, but the three disparate papers in the session at least had the commonality of being textually-based. We were exceedingly efficient as well, and finished half-an-hour early, even with a few questions for everyone.

The University of King's College was a wonderful venue. It is a splendid example of a well-off university spending its money in sensible and satisfying ways. The facilities were in perfect shape, the classrooms nicely designed, the faculty innovative and quirky, the maintenance staff friendly, and the technical staff as efficient as I've ever seen - they would come no more than sixty seconds after being called and promptly fix whatever the problem was.

It was my first dedicated History of Science conference, and it was a good one.

Comments

( 6 comments — Leave a comment )
aerinah
Aug. 8th, 2004 07:35 am (UTC)
Henry House!! I went there Thursday night with a whole gaggle of people, and you're right, it was amazing!! I only wish I'd been brave enough to order fish. I don't normally like fish, so I ordered chicken, and it was terrible, while I tried a bite of G.'s haddock and it was delicious. Still, the service was great and the atmosphere was wonderful, and I think if I had ordered anything other than the apple chicken thing I would have loved the food as well.
owlfish
Aug. 8th, 2004 06:28 pm (UTC)
The Scotch pies were reasonable and the lobster pasta dish rather good. Conor's fries were better with the fish and chips than mine were with the pies. I hope your trip back was good (or will be!)
pittenweem
Aug. 8th, 2004 09:07 am (UTC)
I'm glad you're having a good time and that your paper went well!
(Deleted comment)
owlfish
Aug. 8th, 2004 06:29 pm (UTC)
I've been happy all day long, even though much of it was spent driving. Lunenberg is lovely, it's a nice B&B, and we drove by hours of gorgeous scenery all afternoon long. And I don't have to drive at all tomorrow!!

I hope all's well in southern CA for you.
oursin
Aug. 8th, 2004 02:01 pm (UTC)
I'm so glad your paper went well and you got good feedback. (Though I know that feeling of being on a panel which is made up of all the 'what else can we do with them' papers.)
retsuko
Aug. 10th, 2004 09:23 am (UTC)
Yay! So glad to hear it! It's always nice when that sort of thing goes swimmingly... :-)
( 6 comments — Leave a comment )